classic

classic automotive reviews, specifications, insurance accident lawyers information, cars, motorcycle honda aprilia lamborghini yamaha Harley Davidson ATV news

Finance

Finance automotive reviews, specifications, insurance accident lawyers information, cars, motorcycle honda aprilia lamborghini yamaha Harley Davidson ATV news

insurance

Insurance automotive reviews, specifications, insurance accident lawyers information, cars, motorcycle honda aprilia lamborghini yamaha Harley Davidson ATV news

accident

accident automotive reviews, specifications, insurance accident lawyers information, cars, motorcycle honda aprilia lamborghini yamaha Harley Davidson ATV news

news

news automotive reviews, specifications, insurance accident lawyers information, cars, motorcycle honda aprilia lamborghini yamaha Harley Davidson ATV news

Home » BMW Motorcycle, motorcycle

BMW K1300GT 2009

Submitted by on March 29, 2012 – 11:48 pmNo Comment

The GT boasts 160 hp at 9,000 rpm with 99 ft-lbs at 8,000 rpm. In addition, BMW claims that 80% of max torque is available as early as 3,500 rpm. The K1200GT produced a claimed 152 horsepower at 9,500 rpm and 96 ft-lbs at 7,750 rpm. According to BMW, though the new GT’s engine is nearly identical to the 2009 S model, its more restrictive exhaust and smaller ram-air/airbox capacity account for the lion’s share of a 15 hp deficit to the new S model’s claimed 175 ponies.

With this considerable boost in peak horsepower, the ’09 GT might be back in contention with the rest of the sport-tourers for top-honors in the 1,300cc (give or take) class. Figuring a worst-case scenario 15% loss of ponies to the back wheel, the Beemer might produce somewhere around 135 hp. This puts it on target with the much larger displaced Kawi Concours 14 that’s seen published dyno results of around 134 hp.

Even if it won’t surpass the C14 in sheer power, the BMW will likely out-pull the FJR1300’s 124-ish rwhp. And as much as we like the Honda ST1300, unless Big Red secretly cast some good juju over the ’09 model, it won’t even come close.

But you’re not riding the K1300GT for ultimate speed anyway, you’re riding the GT to go “fast enough,” and do it with some style, convenience and comfort. Let Ricky Racer pass you if he wants; you’ll get to where you’re going with less windblast fatigue and covered in far fewer bug guts than he, thanks to your electronically adjustable windscreen – in tall flavor as standard.

Additionally, you’ll have the ability to adjust handlebar height vertically over a 1.5-inch range, or tweak the adjustable standard rider seat from 33.1 to 32.3 inches. An optional adjustable (32.3” to 31.5”) lower saddle is available at no cost. Most riders will appreciate the seat at 32.3 inches for its reasonable roominess between seat and peg, however, those with less than a 30-inch inseam might find they can plant only one foot securely at a stop.

Partial-integral ABS is standard on the GT, but unlike on the S model ABS cannot be disabled. BMW says the ability to disable the anti-lock system on the sport-oriented S is primarily for race track settings. The Beemer’s brake system works very well, but some pulsing can be felt through the rear brake pedal whether applying only the rear, or the front brake which also activates the rear. This minor and occasional pulse is a non-issue when compared to past experiences with the FJR1300’s ABS and its propensity to nearly punt a rider’s fingers off the lever when ABS activates.

Looking beyond the K1300GT’s high-feeling CoG, the tall and wide bars provide leverage needed to tip in to corners with relative ease. Once set in a turn, the same excellent chassis as found on the hot-rod K1300S keeps the GT feeling like it’s on a magnetic rail through bends. Also, carrying 75 lbs more than the 560 lbs wet-weight of the K1300S seemed to provide the GT with a more forgiving front end than what I experienced on the heavily sprung S model.

Of the four key motorcycles in this U.S. market segment, Yamaha’s FJR1300 is likely the best match-up to the BMW in terms of overall performance.

The FJR’s steering geometry implies a quicker handling bike with a 1.1-inch shorter wheelbase (60.8” v. 61.9”), steeper rake of 26 degrees as opposed to the GT’s 29.4 degrees, and a slightly shorter trail figure of 4.3 versus 4.4 inches. However, the Yamaha gives up 6 lbs in claimed wet weight to the GT’s lighter, ready-to-ride weight of 635 lbs. Is 6 lbs noteworthy? To some this difference is significant, to others not so much. Nevertheless, an excellent sparring session between these two wicked-fast weekend-warriors seems inevitable.

otomaps.com source article: www.netcarshow.com www.motorcycle.com www.roushperformance.com

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

*